Project Brexit

Food and Nutrition

The vast majority of rules governing virtually every aspect of how food and drink is made, distributed and sold emanate from Brussels.

The bulk of these regulations will be transferred into UK law through the EU Withdrawal bill – but both during the passage of this bill and particularly after there will be the possibility to significantly amend the existing legal framework, presenting both challenges and opportunities to the sector.

But it isn’t just the question of what EU food laws will go and which will remain after Brexit that will have a profound impact on British businesses. To take two examples – whether or not the UK continues to be a member of the Single Market and the Customs Union will determine how UK and European businesses can trade across borders. And potential changes to freedom of movement rules for EU citizens could change the way producers and manufacturers operate, as a large proportion of the agriculture workforce in the UK originates from other EU countries.

Food and drink is big business in both the EU and UK. According to industry body FoodDrinkEurope, in 2014-2015, 4.2 million EU citizens worked across 289,000 food and drink companies. Food and nutrition is the leading employer by sector in the EU, providing 15.5% of all jobs. In the UK alone, the sector covers 13.1% of the national employment. The total value of food and drink exports from the UK comes to £20.1 billion, making the industry a substantial contributor to the economy and important to include in any trade deals agreed with the EU and beyond as part of the Brexit process.

Regulation – a quick introduction

EU food and drink legislation aims to guarantee a fair trade in food and feed and protect consumer health. The EU also provides a framework for the harmonisation of rules on animal and plant health.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is a vital body it comes to regulating food safety in the EU – indeed, it was set up to provide scientific advice on everything related to the food chain. EFSA conducts safety assessments in the fields of food and feed safety, nutrition, animal health and welfare, plant protection and plant health. Its activities, findings, and opinions, therefore are of the utmost importance to the industry. But post-Brexit, EFSA will no longer have legal authority in the UK and although its scientific opinions will still have an impact for those UK producers aiming to sell to the Single Market, questions loom large over which institution will replace EFSA in the UK. The Food Safety Authority (FSA) seems to be an obvious contender, although it is not clear whether it has the capacity to fulfil a similar role.

The EU also plays an enormous role in agriculture, with almost 40% of its total budget related to development through the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which provides, among others, regulation for direct payments to farmers, market support measures and rural development programmes. In the UK, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) is responsible for farming (as well as food policy). The department is expected to have one of the biggest “Brexit to do lists” as approximately 1.200 EU laws relate to policy areas Defra oversees.

Risks

  • Manufacturers and producers will have to continue complying with EU law if they wish to trade in Europe – but may lose their ability to influence the regulatory framework
  • EU regulations could be adopted wholesale by the UK government, denying producers / manufacturers the opportunity to take advantage of more liberal individual laws
  • Potential labour shortages in the food and drink sector if there are significant changes to the immigration rights of EU workers – with a consequent rise in food prices
  • After leaving the single market and customs union, UK exports to the EU will potentially become subject to tariffs and custom checks, impacting on the food and drink companies’ competitiveness
  • Regarding trade with countries outside the EU, unless and until it makes further trade deals the UK will lose its preferential trading terms, making the import of raw materials for manufactures of processes foods more expensive
  • Brexit may complicate complex supply chains which often operate across multiple European countries
    Concerns over the ability of the British food safety regulators to take over EFSAs scientific work

Opportunities

  • While the UK government might adopt EU regulations wholesale, there will be opportunities for companies to press for some loosening of individual laws – creating a more advantageous trading environment
    • Companies will welcome the loosening particularly of food labelling requirements to give more flexibility on how products which are not intended for the European market should be explained and presented
  • The UK government will also be able to take advantage of differing labelling requirements, enabling it to better indicate the health benefits of a particular product – as it is planning to do with the labelling of teaspoons of sugar in a food or drink, something currently banned under EU food labelling law

Our Team

If you would like to receive information and analysis on policy developments across our specialist sectors, please complete the following, indicating what sectors you would like to receive information on:







Contact us

We would be delighted to hear from you. If you would like to get in touch with us, please contact us on 020 7463 0690 or use the form below.

We look forward to hearing from you.

For media enquiries, please contact Chris Rogers on 020 7793 2536 / 07720 054189, or email Chris.Rogers@whitehouseconsulting.co.uk.

Contact us via email
  • ace centre
  • Pancreatic Cancer UK
  • Pancreatic Cancer UK
  • Team GB
  • Lilian Baylis Technology School

Sign up for the latest news

  • * Denotes required fields
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contact us

  • * Denotes Required fields
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.