A contrast in styles but Salmond has questions to answer

August 5, 2014 12:46 pm

As heavyweight contests in Scotland go, Alex Salmond versus Alistair Darling tonight might not have quite the explosiveness of the boxing at the Commonwealth Games last week, but will be infinitely more intriguing. And the consequences of one of combatants achieving a knockout (figuratively rather than literally) will have much further reaching ramifications.

The debate promises to be an interesting contrast in styles: Alex Salmond the more extrovert and confident orator who will likely make an emotional appeal, and Darling the dourer speaker likely to rely on facts and evidence to appeal to the head more than the heart. How significant this debate is depends on who you talk to: some pollsters believe the Better Together campaign has now opened up a lead of more than 20 points, which would suggest a bridge too far for the independence campaign. Others believe the margins are far tighter, with the outcome of this debate being a determining factor in whether Scotland remains within the Union.

At first glance, a debate would seemingly favour Alex Salmond as the more natural orator, and indeed most political strategists expect him to win this evening. But it remains to be seen how much of a win Salmond needs in order to make Scottish independence more likely. To return to the boxing analogy, is a points win enough or does he need to take some risks and go for the outright knockout?

The likelihood is the former, and this where the format of the debate – in which the participants will be able to cross examine each other – may help Alistair Darling, although it is a format that will put the former Chancellor under considerable pressure. The format of the debate means that Mr Salmond will have to face some tough questions and give some convincing answers on issues such as membership of the European Union, currency, and the future defence of an independent Scotland – issues that have posed problems for the Yes campaign to date. He will also need to address business concerns in Scotland and the economic case made by Better Together that Scotland would be financially worse off as a result of independence – an argument made again today in a new report from Fiscal Affairs Scotland.

Mr Darling, in contrast, can fall back on the commitments of the three main UK parties that Scotland would have new and wider reaching tax and legal powers in the event of a no vote. And this might offer a nice compromise to undecided voters, who may plump for more autonomy rather than full independence.

It’ll be an intriguing affair and will sound the starting gun on the final stages of the campaign. But don’t underestimate the influence tonight’s debate might have.

To finish the boxing analogy, seconds out…

August 5, 2014 12:46 pm


Sign up to receive analysis on policy developments across our specialist sectors

Contact us

For more information about how Whitehouse can help you, please contact:

Isabella Sharp
t: +44 (0)20 7463 0690
m: +44 (0)7813 307490

Viviana Spaghetti
t: +44 (0)20 7463 0690
m: +44 (0)7583 051119

For media enquiries, please contact:
Mayar Raouf

t: +44 (0)20 7463 0690
m: +44 (0)7502 327092

For career and jobs information, please contact:
t. 020 74630690

For general enquiries, please contact:
t: +44 (0)20 7463 0690

Sign up for the latest news

  • * Denotes required fields
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.